Next, I ran an OpenCL benchmark using LuxMark. It also, again, reiterates how much better the Vega 64 is. This again shows how an eGPU can help level out graphics performance between these two machines. There is a little more separation when comparing the 13- and 15-inch machines when driven by the Razer Core X, but not much.
#APPLE EGPU COMPARISON PRO#
In this test, you can see that the 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pro performed the same while using the Blackmagic eGPU. The second test was a Geekbench 4 Metal compute comparison. Also notice how close the 13-inch and 15-inch machines compare in FPS for each test. Settings for Valley were the same, minus the Tessellation.Īs you can see, the Vega 64-equipped Razer Core X handily outperforms the RX 580 inside the Blackmagic eGPU on both machines, coming close to double the FPS. Settings for Ungine Heaven are as follows: The first test that I ran was an Unigine Valley and Heaven comparison.
#APPLE EGPU COMPARISON 1080P#
Benchmark comparisonsįor all of my testing, I ran both machines in closed display (clamshell) mode while connected to the eGPU and external monitor running at 4K resolution scaled to 1080p (pixel doubled “Retina”). If your primary application is gaming or other graphics-intensive work, then an eGPU will go a long way towards improving your performance, especially in a laptop form factor where things like CPU throttling may come into play.
![apple egpu comparison apple egpu comparison](https://static1.makeuseofimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/best-external-gpu-macbook-pro.jpg)
Of course, this is for graphics performance only, not CPU power. Even my 2017 entry-level MacBook Pro performs comparably to the high-end 15-inch 2018 model while both are using an eGPU. The 13-inch MacBook Pro may be inferior to the discrete graphics capability included with 15-inch models, but that changes when you throw an eGPU into the mix.Īs you can see from the results, an eGPU puts the 13-inch base model 2018 MacBook Pro on even ground (from a graphics perspective) with the souped-up 15-inch MacBook Pro. My second takeaway is this: External GPUs are equalizers when it comes to graphics performance. Subscribe to 9to5Mac on YouTube for more videos The equalizer If you choose a high-end card like the RX Vega 64, it’s performance will nearly double the performance of the RX 580-equipped Blackmagic eGPU. It provides you with the flexibility that comes from being able to choose your own graphics card.
![apple egpu comparison apple egpu comparison](https://photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/35411-65042-Sonnet-Breakaway-Box-l.jpg)
Unless you meet at least one of the two aforementioned scenarios, then you should probably choose to go the custom route with an external chassis like the Razer Core X.
![apple egpu comparison apple egpu comparison](https://1.img-dpreview.com/files/p/E~C73x0S570x570T1200x1200~articles/4405572202/blackmagic_2.jpeg)
Your environment must remain as quiet as possible.There are only two reasons why you might seriously consider the Blackmagic eGPU over the Razer Core X, or similar enclosure like the Sonnet eGFX Breakaway Box. The main takeawaysįirst and foremost, you get more upfront and longterm value for your money by opting for the Razer Core X over a Blackmagic eGPU with a non-upgradable Radeon Pro 580 inside. What did I learn? Watch the video for the details.
#APPLE EGPU COMPARISON FOR MAC#
Using the Razer Core X, an enclosure I rated as the best overall external graphics chassis for Mac users, I ran a variety of benchmark tests with both the 13-inch and 15-inch 2018 MacBook Pro. Specifically, I’d like to see how such a setup compares with the recently released Blackmagic eGPU. Now that new quad-core and hexa-core MacBook Pro models are here, I’ve been eager to see how they pair up with an AMD Vega 64-powered eGPU setup.